Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · View financials
Decision snapshot: EAT stock price vs VMC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at VMC's multiple
Needs VMC P/E.
Implied fair value · at EAT's multiple
Needs EAT P/E.
Live quote
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: EAT FY 2026 (ended Jun 24, 2026) · VMC FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Six fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$108.89
Base
$128.11
Bull
$147.33
VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY · implied price per share
Bear
$107.88
Base
$126.92
Bull
$145.96
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
1.01x
0.51x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
0.39x
1.66x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$110.00M
$187.41M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
$448.00M
$4.36B
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
EAT vs BLMN
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC
EAT vs DRI
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC
EAT vs CBRL
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
EAT vs PLAY
EAGLE MATERIALS INC
EAT vs EXP
CEMEX SAB DE CV
EAT vs CX
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC
EAT vs MLM
Summit Materials, Inc.
EAT vs SUM
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC
EAT vs GVA
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES INC
EAT vs MHK
Live quote
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EAT can sustain its 21.9% revenue growth while preserving its 64.0% ROIC, then EAT looks worth owning or adding because it trades at lower valuation multiples than VMC despite stronger growth; if you prioritize margin quality and steady profitability, the case for a large re-rating is less compelling.
EAT trades at a clear discount to VMC on P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, while the implied price of $275.52 sits well above the current price of $213.70. However, the discount is partly offset by VMC’s materially stronger margin profile and larger earnings base, which helps explain why the market awards VMC higher multiples.
Supporting Metrics
