Electronic Arts Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- —
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EA stock price vs SNPS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at SNPS's multiple
Needs SNPS P/E.
Implied fair value · at EA's multiple
Needs EA P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
SYNOPSYS INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Activision Blizzard, Inc.
EA vs ATVI
Unity Software Inc.
EA vs U
MICROSOFT CORP
EA vs MSFT
TAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE INC
EA vs TTWO
GameStop Corp.
EA vs GME
JUNIPER NETWORKS INC
EA vs JNPR
NVIDIA CORP
EA vs NVDA
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
EA vs AMD
INTEL CORP
EA vs INTC
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
EA vs KEYS
APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE
EA vs AMAT
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EA can re-accelerate growth without giving up its superior ROIC and margin profile, then holding or accumulating on weakness makes sense because the stock is only modestly above the P/E-implied value and still supported by a strong balance sheet profile.
EA's current price of $205.21 is about 7.0% above the P/E-based implied price of $190.85, suggesting the stock is not obviously cheap on this framework. However, EA still trades inside the broader historical band of $184.69 to $225.73 and above the low end of SNPS-implied range, so the discount/premium signal is mixed rather than extreme.
Supporting Metrics