Electronic Arts Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- —
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EA stock price vs JNPR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at JNPR's multiple
Needs JNPR P/E.
Implied fair value · at EA's multiple
Needs EA P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$16.15
Base
$19.35
Bull
$23.51
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Activision Blizzard, Inc.
EA vs ATVI
Unity Software Inc.
EA vs U
MICROSOFT CORP
EA vs MSFT
TAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE INC
EA vs TTWO
GameStop Corp.
EA vs GME
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
EA vs CSCO
Dell Technologies Inc.
EA vs DELL
Palo Alto Networks Inc
EA vs PANW
Fortinet, Inc.
EA vs FTNT
VERISIGN INC/CA
EA vs VRSN
Match Group, Inc.
EA vs MTCH
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EA can sustain high margins and modest growth long enough to justify a premium multiple, then hold or accumulate selectively; if you believe cash-flow reality should converge toward the DCF range, then avoid adding at $209.86 because the implied value gap is very large.
EA trades at a premium valuation with a P/E of 59.8x and EV/EBITDA of 33.7x, while the only explicit intrinsic benchmark provided is a DCF range of $39.21-$53.05 versus a current price of $209.86. That creates a large disconnect between market pricing and modeled value, even though EA’s business quality is well above JNPR’s.
Supporting Metrics