Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: DE stock price vs RTX: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at RTX's multiple
Needs RTX P/E.
Implied fair value · at DE's multiple
Needs DE P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
DEERE & CO · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
RTX CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe DE can sustain its superior margins and ROIC despite negative revenue growth and higher leverage, then the P/E-based rerating case supports owning DE because it trades below RTX on earnings and EV/EBITDA multiples; if you prioritize growth and balance-sheet safety, the weaker growth, 4/9 Piotroski score, and higher debt argue for caution.
DE trades at 33.2x P/E versus RTX at 45.0x and at 14.8x EV/EBITDA versus 20.3x for RTX, suggesting a valuation discount on earnings and cash-flow proxy bases. That discount is partly offset by DE's higher EV/Revenue multiple of 4.4x versus RTX's 3.7x and by DE's position above the midpoint of its own historical trading band but well above the DCF range.
Supporting Metrics
