Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: DE stock price vs PH: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PH's multiple
Needs PH P/E.
Implied fair value · at DE's multiple
Needs DE P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
17 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
DEERE & CO · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION · implied price per share
Bear
$271.45
Base
$330.29
Bull
$406.93
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CATERPILLAR INC
DE vs CAT
AGCO CORP /DE
DE vs AGCO
TORO CO
DE vs TTC
TITAN INTERNATIONAL INC
DE vs TWI
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
DE vs HON
NORDSON CORP
DE vs NDSN
Eaton Corp plc
DE vs ETN
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
DE vs EMR
DANAHER CORP /DE/
DE vs DHR
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
DE vs ITW
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe DE can stabilize growth and hold margins while reducing leverage, then the stock could deserve the current implied upside because it already trades at a discount to PH on every stated valuation multiple; otherwise PH appears higher quality on profitability and balance-sheet strength.
DE trades at lower valuation multiples than PH across P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, suggesting a noticeable discount on a relative basis. However, that discount is partially justified by DE's softer operating profile and higher balance-sheet leverage.
Supporting Metrics
