Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.
$5.06B- Market cap
- $3.09B
- Debt
- +$2.75B
- Cash
- −$784.20M
Capital structure 53% equity / 47% debt · EV / Revenue 0.49x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 9.08x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 ·
Decision snapshot: CWK stock price vs ET: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ET's multiple
Needs ET P/E.
Implied fair value · at CWK's multiple
Needs Annual EPS.
Snapshot Sep 9, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
13 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Capital structure 53% equity / 47% debt · EV / Revenue 0.49x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 9.08x
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. · implied price per share
Bear
$1.12
Base
$2.79
Bull
$4.98
ENERGY TRANSFER LP · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
JONES LANG LASALLE INC
CWK vs JLL
CBRE GROUP, INC.
CWK vs CBRE
Marcus & Millichap, Inc.
CWK vs MMI
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
CWK vs CSGP
RMR GROUP INC.
CWK vs RMR
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.
CWK vs EPD
KINDER MORGAN, INC.
CWK vs KMI
WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC.
CWK vs WMB
ONEOK INC /NEW/
CWK vs OKE
Targa Resources Corp.
CWK vs TRGP
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
The deterministic comparison remains available. Sign in when you want an on-demand narrative synthesis of the same data.