Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CMG stock price vs R: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at R's multiple
Needs R P/E.
Implied fair value · at CMG's multiple
Needs CMG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
RYDER SYSTEM INC · implied price per share
At least 3 of the last 5 annual free-cash-flow observations must be positive.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MCDONALDS CORP
CMG vs MCD
STARBUCKS CORP
CMG vs SBUX
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
CMG vs UPS
DOMINOS PIZZA INC
CMG vs DPZ
Wendy's Co
CMG vs WEN
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC
CMG vs DRI
HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC
CMG vs HTZ
AIR LEASE CORP
CMG vs AL
PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.
CMG vs PAG
U-Haul Holding Co /NV/
CMG vs UHAL
SAIA INC
CMG vs SAIA
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CMG can sustain its 5.4% revenue growth and 35.4% ROIC enough to justify a persistent valuation premium, then hold or selectively add; otherwise, the 23.7% downside versus implied value argues for trimming because the stock already trades well above R-based estimate.
CMG trades at a materially richer valuation than R across P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, while the model implies a price 23.7% below current levels. The gap is supported by CMG’s superior growth and returns, but the market is still paying a large premium that appears difficult to close without continued execution.
Supporting Metrics
