Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CMCSA stock price vs JBL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at JBL's multiple
Needs JBL P/E.
Implied fair value · at CMCSA's multiple
Needs CMCSA P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
COMCAST CORPORATION · implied price per share
Bear
$32.69
Base
$42.75
Bull
$55.84
JABIL INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/
CMCSA vs CHTR
AT&T INC.
CMCSA vs T
Walt Disney Co
CMCSA vs DIS
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC
CMCSA vs BRK-B
NETFLIX INC
CMCSA vs NFLX
T-Mobile US, Inc.
CMCSA vs TMUS
CELESTICA INC
CMCSA vs CLS
Kimball Electronics, Inc.
CMCSA vs KE
TTM TECHNOLOGIES INC
CMCSA vs TTMI
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CMCSA's current low P/E reflects a temporary sentiment discount rather than a structurally weaker business, then consider CMCSA because it trades at 4.4x earnings and 2.8x EV/EBITDA despite stronger margins than JBL; if you instead prioritize growth and capital efficiency, JBL's 3.2% revenue growth and 79.5% ROIC justify its premium.
CMCSA trades at a deep discount to JBL on P/E and EV/EBITDA, with the gap driven by CMCSA's much lower earnings multiple despite similar EV/Revenue. The valuation spread is large enough to suggest CMCSA is cheap on headline metrics, but JBL's premium reflects materially stronger capital efficiency and slightly better growth.
Supporting Metrics
