Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CHTR stock price vs VRSN: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at VRSN's multiple
Needs VRSN P/E.
Implied fair value · at CHTR's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, CHTR P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
11 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Charter Communications, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
VERISIGN INC/CA · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
COMCAST CORP
CHTR vs CMCSA
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
CHTR vs LUMN
AT&T INC.
CHTR vs T
T-Mobile US, Inc.
CHTR vs TMUS
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
CHTR vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
CHTR vs CLFD
MICROSOFT CORP
CHTR vs MSFT
AMAZON COM INC
CHTR vs AMZN
Alphabet Inc.
CHTR vs GOOGL
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
CHTR vs CSCO
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
CHTR vs CRWD
NetApp, Inc.
CHTR vs NTAP
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CHTR can stabilize revenue and sustain its current margins without further balance-sheet deterioration, then the stock looks attractive versus VRSN because it trades at 4.2x earnings and 0.8x sales while sitting near the low end of its historical range.
CHTR trades at a deep discount to VRSN on every major multiple provided, with P/E at 4.2x versus 47.2x, P/S at 0.8x versus 16.1x, and EV/EBITDA at 6.4x versus 20.2x. The implied price of $1709.30 suggests a very large rerating from the current $152.57, but that VRSN-based upside is tempered by the fact that VRSN has structurally superior margins and growth.
Supporting Metrics
