Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CHTR stock price vs MTN: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MTN's multiple
Needs MTN P/E.
Implied fair value · at CHTR's multiple
Needs CHTR P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Charter Communications, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Vail Resorts, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
COMCAST CORP
CHTR vs CMCSA
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
CHTR vs LUMN
AT&T INC.
CHTR vs T
T-Mobile US, Inc.
CHTR vs TMUS
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
CHTR vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
CHTR vs CLFD
MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp
CHTR vs VAC
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC /DE
CHTR vs CHH
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
CHTR vs MODG
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
CHTR vs LYV
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CHTR can stabilize revenue and maintain its current margin structure despite 4.5x Net Debt/EBITDA, then the stock could be attractive on a valuation basis because the P/E and EV/EBITDA multiples are far below MTN and the DCF range is much higher than the current price.
On the supplied P/E framework, CHTR's implied price of $642.45 versus a current price of $144.05 suggests a very large discount to MTN-based valuation. The gap is driven by CHTR's much lower P/E of 4.0x versus MTN's 17.7x, though CHTR also trades at lower P/S and EV/EBITDA multiples, which indicates the market is already pricing in substantial risk.
Supporting Metrics
