Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CAR stock price vs JBHT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at JBHT's multiple
Needs JBHT P/S.
Implied fair value · at CAR's multiple
Needs CAR P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Uber Technologies, Inc
CAR vs UBER
FORD MOTOR CO
CAR vs F
General Motors Co
CAR vs GM
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORP
CAR vs WAB
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
CAR vs ODFL
WERNER ENTERPRISES INC
CAR vs WERN
Hub Group, Inc.
CAR vs HUBG
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
CAR vs KNX
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CAR can reverse its negative net income and improve leverage toward JBHT-like levels, then consider the shares only as a high-risk value recovery idea because the current discount is already offset by much weaker profitability and balance-sheet quality.
CAR trades at a large discount to JBHT on all major valuation measures, with P/S at 0.4x versus 2.1x and EV/Revenue at 0.9x versus 2.2x. The provided implied price of $703.52 sits far above CAR’s current price of $136.61, but that upside is driven by a simple P/S framework that does not reflect CAR’s weaker fundamentals.
Supporting Metrics
