Avis Budget Group, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- +$6.07B
- Cash
- −$519.00M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CAR stock price vs GM: inconclusive — current versus $127.21 implied using P/S multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at GM's multiple
Implied fair value · at CAR's multiple
Needs CAR P/S.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Uber Technologies, Inc
CAR vs UBER
FORD MOTOR CO
CAR vs F
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
CAR vs JBHT
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORP
CAR vs WAB
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
CAR vs ODFL
Tesla, Inc.
CAR vs TSLA
Rivian Automotive, Inc. / DE
CAR vs RIVN
Lucid Group, Inc.
CAR vs LCID
Nikola Corp
CAR vs NKLA
Fisker Inc.
CAR vs FSR
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CAR can sustain margins and improve earnings quality from the current weak base, then a modestly constructive stance is justified because the stock already trades near GM-implied fair value and below the DCF range; otherwise, the lack of profitability support argues for patience.
CAR’s current price of $138.88 is just below the implied price of $137.42, implying only -1.1% downside and therefore no meaningful valuation gap. On a relative basis, CAR and GM both trade at 0.4x P/S, while CAR looks cheaper on EV/Revenue and roughly in line on EV/EBITDA.
Supporting Metrics