Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AZZ stock price vs MTD: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MTD's multiple
Needs MTD P/E.
Implied fair value · at AZZ's multiple
Needs AZZ P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AZZ Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Mettler-Toledo International Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
VALMONT INDUSTRIES INC
AZZ vs VMI
SMITH A O CORP
AZZ vs AOS
PPG INDUSTRIES INC
AZZ vs PPG
Fabrinet
AZZ vs FN
WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC.
AZZ vs WOR
STEEL DYNAMICS INC
AZZ vs STLD
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
AZZ vs TMO
DANAHER CORP /DE/
AZZ vs DHR
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
AZZ vs A
WATERS CORP /DE/
AZZ vs WAT
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AZZ can sustain 4%+ revenue growth while preserving its 36.9% EBITDA margin and 13.6% ROIC, then AZZ looks attractive to own because it trades at 14.4x P/E and 2.7x P/S versus MTD's 26.9x and 6.0x.
AZZ trades at a meaningful valuation discount to MTD on both earnings and sales bases, with a 14.4x P/E versus 26.9x for MTD and a 2.7x P/S versus 6.0x for MTD. The implied price of $282.54 suggests 87.2% upside from the current $150.89, but AZZ also sits below MTD-implied range and near the upper end of its historical band.
Supporting Metrics
