Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot
AZZ stock price vs FN: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan where each company leads, where gaps are small, and where comparisons are not meaningful.
| Metric | AZZ | FN | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Revenue growth (YoY) FY 2025 -> FY 2026 | 4.6% | 35.7% | FN leads by 87.2% Higher Revenue growth |
Gross margin | 23.9% | 12.0% | AZZ leads by 99.6% Higher Gross margin |
EBITDA margin | 36.9% | 13.5% | AZZ leads by 174.0% Higher EBITDA margin |
EV/Revenue | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
P/E | N/M | N/M | Not comparable Not comparable |
Net debt / EBITDA | 1.0 | -1.4 | FN leads by 172.9% Lower Net debt / EBITDA |
Statements
Core income statement and balance sheet metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | AZZ | Delta vs FN | FN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.65B | 64.4% lower | $4.64B |
| Gross profit | $394.96M | 29.0% lower | $556.51M |
| Operating income | $264.62M | 42.8% lower | $462.89M |
| EBITDA | $609.07M | 2.6% lower | $625.30M |
| Net income | $317.26M | 32.9% lower | $473.03M |
| EPS | 10.5 | 19.5% lower | 13.1 |
| Revenue growth | 4.6% | 87.2% lower | 35.7% |
| Gross margin | 23.9% | 99.6% higher | 12.0% |
| Operating margin | 16.0% | 60.8% higher | 10.0% |
| EBITDA margin | 36.9% | 174.0% higher | 13.5% |
| Net margin | 19.2% | 88.6% higher | 10.2% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
Market cap + debt - cash, shown for the current pair and benchmark median context.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both companies in context relative to a wider comparable universe.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
AZZ appears materially undervalued versus FN on every earnings- and cash-flow-linked multiple while also showing stronger margins, with the main offset being FN's superior growth and ROIC.
If you believe AZZ can sustain its stronger margins while narrowing the growth gap to FN, then AZZ looks attractive to own or add because its current multiples are far below FN's despite better profitability and strong quality scores.
AZZ trades at a steep discount to FN across valuation measures, with a P/E of 14.2x versus FN's 49.7x and EV/EBITDA of 8.3x versus 37.6x. The provided model implies a much higher value for AZZ, but its current price remains inside the historical band and near the lower end of the DCF range, suggesting the market is pricing in lower growth and quality than FN.
Supporting Metrics