Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AZZ stock price vs ITW: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ITW's multiple
Needs ITW P/E.
Implied fair value · at AZZ's multiple
Needs AZZ P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AZZ Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC · implied price per share
Bear
$71.88
Base
$86.99
Bull
$109.51
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
VALMONT INDUSTRIES INC
AZZ vs VMI
SMITH A O CORP
AZZ vs AOS
PPG INDUSTRIES INC
AZZ vs PPG
Fabrinet
AZZ vs FN
WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC.
AZZ vs WOR
STEEL DYNAMICS INC
AZZ vs STLD
3M Company
AZZ vs MMM
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
AZZ vs HON
General Electric Company
AZZ vs GE
Parker-Hannifin Corp
AZZ vs PH
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AZZ can close part of its valuation gap to ITW without needing ITW-level margins or ROIC, then AZZ looks attractive to own because it trades at a clear multiple discount while still showing solid growth and strong quality scores.
AZZ trades at 14.4x P/E versus ITW at 24.5x, yet the implied price based on ITW multiple is $257.68 versus the current $150.89, suggesting a large relative valuation gap. The market appears to be discounting AZZ for its lower margin structure and smaller scale, even though its growth and balance sheet metrics are respectable.
Supporting Metrics
