Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · Mkt capMarket cap $48.05B · View financials
Snapshot Sep 14, 2026, 10:19 AM ET
FY 2025 ·
Decision snapshot: AZO stock price vs SATS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at SATS's multiple
Needs SATS P/E.
Implied fair value · at AZO's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AUTOZONE INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
EchoStar Corporation · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
O REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC
AZO vs ORLY
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC
AZO vs AAP
GENUINE PARTS CO
AZO vs GPC
ETHAN ALLEN INTERIORS INC
AZO vs ETD
NORDSTROM INC
AZO vs JWN
ROSS STORES, INC.
AZO vs ROST
AT&T INC.
AZO vs T
Clearfield, Inc.
AZO vs CLFD
T-Mobile US, Inc.
AZO vs TMUS
COMCAST CORP
AZO vs CMCSA
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
AZO vs VZ
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/
AZO vs CHTR
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AZO’s superior margins, ROIC, and earnings durability deserve a premium over the DCF range, then maintain a bullish relative stance on AZO because SATS is not an economically comparable benchmark and its losses make SATS multiple unreliable.
On the provided P/S comparison, AZO’s implied price is $304.30 versus a current price of $2998.86, which mechanically shows a large negative gap of -89.9%. That gap is driven by the fact that SATS is a weak valuation anchor with negative earnings and margins, so SATS-based P/S framework is not a meaningful benchmark for AZO’s business quality.
Supporting Metrics
