Autozone Inc
—- Market cap
- $46.96B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$271.80M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · Mkt capMarket cap $46.96B · View financials
Snapshot Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Decision snapshot: AZO stock price vs CHTR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CHTR's multiple
Needs CHTR P/E.
Implied fair value · at AZO's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AUTOZONE INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Charter Communications, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
O REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC
AZO vs ORLY
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC
AZO vs AAP
GENUINE PARTS CO
AZO vs GPC
ETHAN ALLEN INTERIORS INC
AZO vs ETD
NORDSTROM INC
AZO vs JWN
ROSS STORES, INC.
AZO vs ROST
COMCAST CORP
AZO vs CMCSA
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
AZO vs LUMN
AT&T INC.
AZO vs T
T-Mobile US, Inc.
AZO vs TMUS
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
AZO vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
AZO vs CLFD
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AZO’s superior ROIC, margins, and positive growth deserve a persistent premium over CHTR, then remain constructive on AZO despite the model’s implied downside, because the valuation gap is partly supported by higher business quality.
On a P/E basis, AZO trades at 21.2x versus CHTR at 4.3x, which implies a large relative premium and helps explain the model’s negative upside to an implied price of $629.89. However, AZO also looks richer because it has meaningfully better profitability and capital efficiency than CHTR, so the valuation gap is partially justified by fundamentals.
Supporting Metrics