Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: ADSK stock price vs ORCL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ORCL's multiple
Needs ORCL P/E.
Implied fair value · at ADSK's multiple
Needs ADSK P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Autodesk, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$122.90
Base
$144.16
Bull
$171.85
Oracle Corporation · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.
ADSK vs WLY
TRIMBLE INC.
ADSK vs TRMB
NVIDIA CORP
ADSK vs NVDA
ADOBE INC.
ADSK vs ADBE
ANSYS INC
ADSK vs ANSS
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC
ADSK vs TYL
Microsoft Corporation
ADSK vs MSFT
Amazon.com, Inc.
ADSK vs AMZN
Alphabet Inc.
ADSK vs GOOGL
International Business Machines Corporation
ADSK vs IBM
Cisco Systems, Inc.
ADSK vs CSCO
Salesforce, Inc.
ADSK vs CRM
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ADSK can sustain its 17.5% revenue growth and 91.0% gross margin while closing the profitability gap to ORCL, then hold rather than add aggressively because the current valuation already embeds a premium that looks hard to justify on P/E and EV/EBITDA.
Using the provided P/E framework, ADSK appears overvalued: the implied price is $116.50 versus a current price of $234.20, or -50.3% downside. The gap is less severe on sales multiples, where ADSK’s P/S and EV/Revenue are only modestly above ORCL, suggesting the discount is driven more by earnings-multiple compression than by revenue quality alone.
Supporting Metrics
