Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: ADSK stock price vs CSCO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CSCO's multiple
Needs CSCO P/E.
Implied fair value · at ADSK's multiple
Needs ADSK P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Autodesk, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$122.90
Base
$144.16
Bull
$171.85
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$32.30
Base
$38.62
Bull
$46.85
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.
ADSK vs WLY
TRIMBLE INC.
ADSK vs TRMB
NVIDIA CORP
ADSK vs NVDA
ADOBE INC.
ADSK vs ADBE
ANSYS INC
ADSK vs ANSS
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC
ADSK vs TYL
CIENA CORP
ADSK vs CIEN
Palo Alto Networks Inc
ADSK vs PANW
JUNIPER NETWORKS INC
ADSK vs JNPR
Fortinet, Inc.
ADSK vs FTNT
Arista Networks, Inc.
ADSK vs ANET
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
ADSK vs LDOS
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ADSK can sustain its 17.5% revenue growth and 48.6% ROIC while keeping margins near current levels, then a hold-to-slightly-bullish stance is reasonable because the stock is fairly valued on P/E and not obviously expensive versus CSCO on EV/Revenue and EV/EBITDA.
ADSK is priced almost exactly at CSCO-implied P/E value of $249.05 versus a current price of $249.08, implying no meaningful upside or downside on that basis. Relative to CSCO, ADSK looks cheaper on EV/EBITDA and EV/Revenue but not on P/E, which leaves the valuation case balanced rather than clearly compelling.
Supporting Metrics
