Adjust assumptions
Adjust the usable peer mix to see how each valuation multiple moves the blended fair value.
Peer-implied fair value
—
Blended value per share under the current mix.
Current price
—
Market price unavailable
Peer gap
N/A
Peer gap unavailable
Weighting mixer
No usable valuation methods are available for this peer set.
Value contribution
5 peers →Assign weight to at least one usable method to see the contribution split.
Equal-weight baseline
The simple average of every usable peer method, before your weighting adjustments.
Baseline equity value
—
Baseline / share
—
Relative valuation prices this company against what the market already pays for its peers. For a cash-flow view that does not inherit peer sentiment, open the intrinsic model.
Spreadsheet data
Audit the saved peer set and the method inputs behind the blended fair value.
The saved peer set across price, scale, operating metrics, and raw valuation multiples.
| Peer | Price | Market cap | Enterprise value | Revenue | EBITDA | Net income |
|---|
| P/E |
|---|
| P/S |
|---|
| EV/EBITDA |
|---|
PEP PEPSICO INC FY ended Jan 23, 2026 | — | — | — | $93.93B | $14.61B | $8.24B | — | — | — |
KO COCA COLA CO FY ended Feb 18, 2026 | — | — | — | $47.94B | $18.69B | $13.11B | — | — | — |
KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. FY ended Feb 20, 2026 | — | — | — | $16.60B | $3.78B | $2.08B | — | — | — |
MNST Monster Beverage Corp FY ended Feb 13, 2026 | — | — | — | $8.29B | $2.51B | $1.91B | — | — | — |
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. FY ended Feb 23, 2026 | — | — | — | $2.52B | $200.23M | $108.00M | — | — | — |
PEP
PEPSICO INC
—
—
—
$93.93B
$14.61B
—
—
—
Cap —EV —Rev $93.93BEBITDA $14.61BP/E —P/S —EV/EBITDA —
KO
COCA COLA CO
—
—
—
$47.94B
$18.69B
—
—
—
Cap —EV —Rev $47.94BEBITDA $18.69BP/E —P/S —EV/EBITDA —
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
—
—
—
$16.60B
$3.78B
—
—
—
Cap —EV —Rev $16.60BEBITDA $3.78BP/E —P/S —EV/EBITDA —
MNST
Monster Beverage Corp
—
—
—
$8.29B
$2.51B
—
—
—
Cap —EV —Rev $8.29BEBITDA $2.51BP/E —P/S —EV/EBITDA —
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
—
—
—
$2.52B
$200.23M
—
—
—
Cap —EV —Rev $2.52BEBITDA $200.23MP/E —P/S —EV/EBITDA —
Which peer averages feed the weighted fair value, and which methods are excluded.
| Method | Type | Avg. multiple | Coverage | Implied equity value | Fair value / share | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EV / EBITDA EVExcluded | Enterprise Multiple | — | 0/5 | — | — | No saved peers have usable coverage for this method. |
Price / Sales PSExcluded | Equity Multiple | — | 0/5 | — | — | No saved peers have usable coverage for this method. |
Price / Earnings PEExcluded | Equity Multiple | — | 0/5 | — | — | No saved peers have usable coverage for this method. |
EV / EBITDA
EV · Enterprise Multiple
Avg. multiple
—
Coverage
0/5
Implied equity value
—
Fair value / share
—
No saved peers have usable coverage for this method.
Price / Sales
PS · Equity Multiple
Avg. multiple
—
Coverage
0/5
Implied equity value
—
Fair value / share
—
No saved peers have usable coverage for this method.
Price / Earnings
PE · Equity Multiple
Avg. multiple
—
Coverage
0/5
Implied equity value
—
Fair value / share
—
No saved peers have usable coverage for this method.
