Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: ZS stock price vs MSFT: inconclusive — current versus $222.53 implied using P/S multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MSFT's multiple
Implied fair value · at ZS's multiple
Needs ZS P/S.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Zscaler Inc · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
MICROSOFT CORP · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Palo Alto Networks Inc
ZS vs PANW
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
ZS vs CRWD
Okta, Inc.
ZS vs OKTA
Cloudflare, Inc.
ZS vs NET
Fortinet, Inc.
ZS vs FTNT
Apple Inc.
ZS vs AAPL
Alphabet Inc.
ZS vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
ZS vs AMZN
ADOBE INC.
ZS vs ADBE
NVIDIA CORP
ZS vs NVDA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
ZS vs CSCO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ZS can sustain 20%+ revenue growth while converting that growth into positive operating margins, then the stock looks attractive relative to MSFT because its P/S and EV/Revenue multiples are below MSFT and the implied price points to 16.1% upside.
ZS trades at 9.1x P/S versus MSFT at 10.4x, so the valuation gap is modest rather than dramatic. The implied price of $175.60 suggests 16.1% upside from the current $151.20, and the stock is already within its historical band of $136.08 to $166.32.
Supporting Metrics
