Zoom Communications, Inc.
$28.59B- Market cap
- $29.76B
- Debt
- +$107.04M
- Cash
- −$1.27B
Capital structure 100% equity / 0% debt · EV / Revenue 5.87x · EV / EBITDA 11.08x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: ZM stock price vs BHC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at BHC's multiple
Needs BHC P/E.
Implied fair value · at ZM's multiple
Needs ZM P/E.
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Multiple premium
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: ZM FY 2026 (ended Jan 31, 2026) · BHC FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Six fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Capital structure 100% equity / 0% debt · EV / Revenue 5.87x · EV / EBITDA 11.08x
Capital structure 10% equity / 90% debt · EV / Revenue 2.16x · EV / EBITDA 9.16x
ZM carries the larger enterprise value at $28.59B against $22.19B; BHC trades on the lower EV / Revenue multiple (2.16x vs 5.87x); BHC on the lower EV / EBITDA (9.16x vs 11.08x).
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Zoom Communications, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Bausch Health Companies Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
0.01x
-37.98x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
-0.45x
8.15x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$1.27B
$1.31B
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Microsoft Corporation
ZM vs MSFT
Cisco Systems, Inc.
ZM vs CSCO
Salesforce, Inc.
ZM vs CRM
TWILIO INC
ZM vs TWLO
AbbVie Inc.
ZM vs ABBV
Organon & Co.
ZM vs OGN
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD
ZM vs TEVA
SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
ZM vs SUPN
ANI PHARMACEUTICALS INC
ZM vs ANIP
$107.04M
$21.04B
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
The deterministic comparison remains available. Sign in when you want an on-demand narrative synthesis of the same data.