Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: YELP stock price vs H: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at H's multiple
Needs H P/E.
Implied fair value · at YELP's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, YELP P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
YELP INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Hyatt Hotels Corp · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TripAdvisor, Inc.
YELP vs TRIP
Booking Holdings Inc.
YELP vs BKNG
Expedia Group, Inc.
YELP vs EXPE
Match Group, Inc.
YELP vs MTCH
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC /MD/
YELP vs MAR
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
YELP vs HLT
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC /DE
YELP vs CHH
WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
YELP vs WH
HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
YELP vs HST
INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP PLC /NEW/
YELP vs IHG
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe YELP can sustain its stronger profitability while modestly improving growth, then the stock looks attractive to own because it trades at a lower sales multiple than H and sits below the DCF value range despite better margins and a stronger balance sheet.
YELP trades at 1.0x P/S versus H at 2.4x, yet the model implies a $59.23 price for YELP versus the current $25.69, suggesting 130.5% upside. The gap is consistent with YELP's superior margin profile and much lower leverage, but the valuation case is less certain because H has higher top-line growth and several metrics are not directly comparable.
Supporting Metrics
