Walmart Inc.
$872.87B- Market cap
- $838.83B
- Debt
- +$44.76B
- Cash
- −$10.73B
Capital structure 95% equity / 5% debt · EV / Revenue 1.22x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2026 · Mkt capMarket cap $838.83B · View financials
Snapshot Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
FY 2025 · Mkt cap
Decision snapshot: WMT stock price at discount vs TSLA $105.73 current versus $1.14K implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TSLA's multiple
Implied fair value · at WMT's multiple
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Lower P/E
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Capital structure 95% equity / 5% debt · EV / Revenue 1.22x
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
WALMART INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$26.01
Base
$31.42
Bull
$38.87
Tesla, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TARGET CORP
WMT vs TGT
Costco Wholesale Corporation
WMT vs COST
Amazon.com, Inc.
WMT vs AMZN
CVS Health Corporation
WMT vs CVS
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
WMT vs WBA
DOLLAR GENERAL CORP
WMT vs DG
Lucid Group, Inc.
WMT vs LCID
FORD MOTOR CO
WMT vs F
General Motors Co
WMT vs GM
Enphase Energy, Inc.
WMT vs ENPH
PLUG POWER INC
WMT vs PLUG
COPART INC
WMT vs CPRT
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TSLA-style valuation multiples should not be applied to WMT, then avoid using TSLA-implied price as a buy signal because WMT’s own historical band and operating profile do not support a 914.4% rerating.
The valuation gap is extreme: the P/E-based implied price for WMT is $1,136.79 versus a current price of $112.07, implying 914.4% upside on this framework. However, that implied value is distorted by TSLA comparison because TSLA trades at 416.4x P/E, far above WMT’s 40.8x, making TSLA multiple look structurally inappropriate for a low-growth retailer.
Supporting Metrics