Walmart Inc.
$874.46B- Market cap
- $840.42B
- Debt
- +$44.76B
- Cash
- −$10.73B
Capital structure 95% equity / 5% debt · EV / Revenue 1.23x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2026 · Mkt capMarket cap $840.42B · View financials
Snapshot Sep 11, 2026, 10:39 AM ET
FY 2025 · Mkt cap
Decision snapshot: WMT stock price at premium vs PPG $105.93 current versus $41.58 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PPG's multiple
Implied fair value · at WMT's multiple
Snapshot Sep 11, 2026, 10:38 AM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Higher P/E
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
11 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Capital structure 95% equity / 5% debt · EV / Revenue 1.23x
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
WALMART INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$26.01
Base
$31.42
Bull
$38.87
PPG INDUSTRIES INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TARGET CORP
WMT vs TGT
Costco Wholesale Corporation
WMT vs COST
Amazon.com, Inc.
WMT vs AMZN
CVS Health Corporation
WMT vs CVS
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
WMT vs WBA
DOLLAR GENERAL CORP
WMT vs DG
SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO
WMT vs SHW
RPM INTERNATIONAL INC/DE/
WMT vs RPM
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.
WMT vs AXTA
FULLER H B CO
WMT vs FUL
3M CO
WMT vs MMM
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe WMT’s higher P/E is justified by its stronger growth, higher ROIC, and lower leverage, then holding or buying on pullbacks makes sense because the market is already pricing in a premium versus PPG despite WMT’s superior scale and balance-sheet profile.
On a P/E basis, WMT screens expensive versus PPG at 40.8x versus 16.4x, which implies the model’s PPG-based fair value would be far below the current price. However, the broader trading picture is less one-sided because WMT also carries a lower EV/Revenue multiple than PPG and sits near the upper end of its historical range.
Supporting Metrics