Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: WMT stock price vs PFE: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PFE's multiple
Needs PFE P/E.
Implied fair value · at WMT's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Capital structure 95% equity / 5% debt · EV / Revenue 1.29x
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
WALMART INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$26.01
Base
$31.42
Bull
$38.87
PFIZER INC · implied price per share
Bear
$10.17
Base
$12.82
Bull
$17.53
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TARGET CORP
WMT vs TGT
Costco Wholesale Corporation
WMT vs COST
Amazon.com, Inc.
WMT vs AMZN
CVS Health Corporation
WMT vs CVS
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
WMT vs WBA
DOLLAR GENERAL CORP
WMT vs DG
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
WMT vs JNJ
Merck & Co., Inc.
WMT vs MRK
AbbVie Inc.
WMT vs ABBV
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO
WMT vs BMY
ELI LILLY & Co
WMT vs LLY
AMGEN INC
WMT vs AMGN
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe WMT can sustain its 4.7% revenue growth and 22.8% ROIC without a major margin reset, then hold or own WMT selectively, because its premium valuation is supported by stronger growth and a cleaner balance sheet than PFE despite the steep P/E discount signal.
On the supplied P/E-based valuation, WMT’s current price of $111.96 implies a -54.3% downside to $51.13, indicating a large discount only if PFE is the correct benchmark. However, PFE set is not like-for-like: WMT trades at a much richer P/E than PFE while also carrying a lower P/S and lower EV/Revenue, which points to a quality/growth premium rather than a broad-based overvaluation signal.
Supporting Metrics
