Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · Mkt capMarket cap $186.12B · View financials
Decision snapshot: WMT stock price vs INTC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at INTC's multiple
Needs INTC P/E.
Implied fair value · at WMT's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Multiple discount
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Capital structure 95% equity / 5% debt · EV / Revenue 1.29x
Capital structure 80% equity / 20% debt · EV / Revenue 4.13x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 23.01x
WMT carries the larger enterprise value at $917.93B against $218.44B; WMT trades on the lower EV / Revenue multiple (1.29x vs 4.13x).
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
WALMART INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$26.01
Base
$31.42
Bull
$38.87
INTEL CORP · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TARGET CORP
WMT vs TGT
Costco Wholesale Corporation
WMT vs COST
Amazon.com, Inc.
WMT vs AMZN
CVS Health Corporation
WMT vs CVS
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
WMT vs WBA
DOLLAR GENERAL CORP
WMT vs DG
NVIDIA Corporation
WMT vs NVDA
QUALCOMM Incorporated
WMT vs QCOM
Broadcom Inc.
WMT vs AVGO
Texas Instruments Incorporated
WMT vs TXN
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe WMT can sustain its 4.7% revenue growth and 22.8% ROIC without a meaningful multiple compression, then hold only with caution; otherwise, reduce exposure because the current price of $110.39 is far above the DCF range and the P/S-implied value is not credible relative to the provided fundamentals.
The valuation gap is extremely wide: WMT trades at $110.39 versus a P/S-implied value of $897.01, implying 712.6% downside on this framework. The current price also sits above the top of the historical band and far above the DCF range, suggesting the market is already pricing in a very rich multiple relative to the inputs provided.
Supporting Metrics
