Williams Companies, Inc.
—- Market cap
- $90.70B
- Debt
- +$28.02B
- Cash
- —
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 76% equity / 24% debt
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · Mkt cap
Decision snapshot: WMB stock price vs RLI: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at RLI's multiple
Needs RLI P/E.
Implied fair value · at WMB's multiple
Needs WMB P/E.
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Multiple premium
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: WMB FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · RLI FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025).
Trendline
Five fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 76% equity / 24% debt
Capital structure 98% equity / 2% debt · EV / Revenue 3.07x · EV / EBITDA 11.23x
WMB carries the larger enterprise value at $118.71B against $5.78B; RLI trades on the lower EV / Revenue multiple (3.07x vs 9.93x); RLI on the lower EV / EBITDA (11.23x vs 21.68x).
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
RLI Corp · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
2.19x
0.06x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
—
0.09x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
—
$51.57M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
$28.02B
$100.00M
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
KINDER MORGAN, INC.
WMB vs KMI
ONEOK INC /NEW/
WMB vs OKE
Energy Transfer LP
WMB vs ET
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.
WMB vs EPD
TRAVELERS COMPANIES, INC.
WMB vs TRV
Chubb Ltd
WMB vs CB
ALLSTATE CORP
WMB vs ALL
HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
WMB vs THG
HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
WMB vs HIG
MARKEL GROUP INC.
WMB vs MKL
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
The deterministic comparison remains available. Sign in when you want an on-demand narrative synthesis of the same data.