Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: WDAY stock price vs PYPL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PYPL's multiple
Needs PYPL P/E.
Implied fair value · at WDAY's multiple
Needs WDAY P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Workday, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
PayPal Holdings, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Salesforce, Inc.
WDAY vs CRM
Oracle Corporation
WDAY vs ORCL
INTUIT INC.
WDAY vs INTU
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC
WDAY vs ADP
Paycom Software, Inc.
WDAY vs PAYC
VISA INC.
WDAY vs V
Mastercard Inc
WDAY vs MA
Block, Inc.
WDAY vs XYZ
AMERICAN EXPRESS CO
WDAY vs AXP
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC
WDAY vs MKTX
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC
WDAY vs FDS
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe WDAY can sustain 13.1% revenue growth while expanding operating margin beyond 7.5%, then holding may be justified, but relative to PYPL the current valuation still looks stretched because WDAY trades at 61.9x P/E and 3.7x P/S despite weaker profitability and lower ROIC.
WDAY’s current price of $160.34 versus a P/E-derived implied price of $27.39 implies an 82.9% downside in this framework, highlighting a very large valuation disconnect. The gap is especially stark because WDAY screens more expensive than PYPL on P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue while not showing superior profitability.
Supporting Metrics
