Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: WAB stock price vs UNP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at UNP's multiple
Needs UNP P/E.
Implied fair value · at WAB's multiple
Needs WAB P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
UNION PACIFIC CORP · implied price per share
Bear
$48.04
Base
$60.40
Bull
$82.32
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Caterpillar Inc.
WAB vs CAT
CUMMINS INC
WAB vs CMI
GATX CORP
WAB vs GATX
Parker-Hannifin Corp
WAB vs PH
CSX CORP
WAB vs CSX
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY CO
WAB vs CNI
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORP
WAB vs NSC
CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LTD/CN
WAB vs CP
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
WAB vs KNX
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe WAB should trade in line with UNP's earnings multiple (P/E ~21.2x) and WAB's margins (Operating Margin 15.5%, EBITDA Margin 20.2%) will not materially converge toward UNP's levels, then reduce exposure or sell because UNP-implied P/E price is $128.04 (versus current $230.11) implying ~44% downside driven by WAB's higher P/E (38.1x) and EV/EBITDA (20.4x) relative to UNP.
WAB's current price of $230.11 implies a ~44.4% downside to UNP-implied P/E price of $128.04; its P/E (38.1x) is a large premium to UNP (21.2x). On an enterprise profitability basis WAB also trades at a higher EV/EBITDA (20.4x vs 12.5x), driving most of the valuation gap.
Supporting Metrics
