Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: VZ stock price vs STAG: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at STAG's multiple
Needs STAG P/E.
Implied fair value · at VZ's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, VZ P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
STAG Industrial, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AT&T INC.
VZ vs T
COMCAST CORP
VZ vs CMCSA
T-Mobile US, Inc.
VZ vs TMUS
Clearfield, Inc.
VZ vs CLFD
EchoStar CORP
VZ vs SATS
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/
VZ vs CHTR
Prologis, Inc.
VZ vs PLD
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
VZ vs REXR
Terreno Realty Corp
VZ vs TRNO
FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST INC
VZ vs FR
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe VZ deserves to trade closer to its own historical band rather than a STAG-style revenue multiple, then avoid treating STAG-implied price as actionable upside because the comparison is distorted by very different valuation bases and VZ already sits near its historical range.
VZ trades at a large valuation discount to STAG-implied price VZ, with current price $46.81 versus an implied $283.60, suggesting a 505.8% upside gap if STAG’s multiple were applied. However, the comparison appears structurally distorted because STAG is valued on much richer revenue and EBITDA multiples despite being the smaller company, while VZ also sits within its own historical trading band.
Supporting Metrics
