Verizon Communications Inc
—- Market cap
- $207.61B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$19.05B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 ·
Decision snapshot: VZ stock price at discount vs NFLX $49.97 current versus $1.43K implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NFLX's multiple
Implied fair value · at VZ's multiple
Close Dec 31, 2024
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Lower P/E
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
13 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
NETFLIX INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AT&T INC.
VZ vs T
COMCAST CORP
VZ vs CMCSA
T-Mobile US, Inc.
VZ vs TMUS
Clearfield, Inc.
VZ vs CLFD
EchoStar CORP
VZ vs SATS
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/
VZ vs CHTR
Apple Inc.
VZ vs AAPL
AMAZON COM INC
VZ vs AMZN
Walt Disney Co
VZ vs DIS
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
VZ vs WBD
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
VZ vs LYV
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe VZ can sustain its current margins while gradually accelerating growth without materially increasing leverage, then VZ looks attractive versus NFLX because the stock trades at far lower P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue multiples while also remaining within its historical band.
VZ trades at a deep discount to NFLX on both earnings and revenue-based valuation, while NFLX-implied price range sits far above the current share price. The gap is driven by NFLX’s much faster growth and much higher ROIC, but VZ’s lower multiples suggest the market is pricing it as a mature, slower-growth utility-like cash generator.
Supporting Metrics