Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: VZ stock price vs MSGS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MSGS's multiple
Needs MSGS P/E.
Implied fair value · at VZ's multiple
Needs VZ P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
MADISON SQUARE GARDEN SPORTS CORP. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AT&T INC.
VZ vs T
COMCAST CORP
VZ vs CMCSA
T-Mobile US, Inc.
VZ vs TMUS
Clearfield, Inc.
VZ vs CLFD
EchoStar CORP
VZ vs SATS
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/
VZ vs CHTR
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
VZ vs LYV
VAIL RESORTS INC
VZ vs MTN
Manchester United plc
VZ vs MANU
Liberty Media Corp
VZ vs FWONA
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe VZ should be valued on its own stable cash-generating telecom fundamentals rather than an MSGS-based sales multiple, then avoid treating the $309.41 implied price as actionable and instead anchor on VZ’s historical band and earnings-based valuation because MSGS comparison is distorted by MSGS’s negative earnings and tiny revenue base.
The valuation gap is extreme: VZ trades at 1.4x P/S and 11.5x P/E, while MSGS trades at 9.4x P/S and a deeply negative -423.3x P/E because earnings are negative. The model’s implied price of $309.41 versus VZ’s current $46.81 suggests 561.0% upside, but that result is mechanically driven by applying MSGS’s much richer sales multiple to a far larger, profitable business.
Supporting Metrics
