Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: VSAT stock price vs ASTS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ASTS's multiple
Needs ASTS P/S.
Implied fair value · at VSAT's multiple
Needs Revenue / share, VSAT P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
VIASAT, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
AST SPACEMOBILE, INC. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP /DE/
VSAT vs CMTL
GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD
VSAT vs GILT
Spire Global, Inc.
VSAT vs SPIR
Iridium Communications Inc.
VSAT vs IRDM
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. /DE/
VSAT vs LHX
KVH INDUSTRIES INC \DE\
VSAT vs KVHI
Globalstar, Inc.
VSAT vs GSAT
Rocket Lab USA, Inc.
VSAT vs RKLB
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ASTS can sustain its extreme revenue growth long enough to justify its premium multiples, then avoid using ASTS-multiple result as a buy signal for VSAT; otherwise, VSAT looks like the more defensible value name because it is far larger, closer to profitability, and far cheaper on both P/S and EV/Revenue.
VSAT trades at 2.3x P/S and 2.1x EV/Revenue versus ASTS at 212.9x P/S and 183.1x EV/Revenue, so ASTS-based model produces an extreme implied price gap. However, that gap is driven by ASTS's tiny revenue base of $70.9M and very high growth rate of 1505.2%, which makes a simple revenue multiple comparison highly unstable.
Supporting Metrics
