Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: VRT stock price vs TT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TT's multiple
Needs TT P/E.
Implied fair value · at VRT's multiple
Needs VRT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Vertiv Holdings Co · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC · implied price per share
Bear
$125.61
Base
$149.98
Bull
$181.70
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Eaton Corp plc
VRT vs ETN
ACUITY BRANDS INC
VRT vs AYI
nVent Electric plc
VRT vs NVT
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
VRT vs HON
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC
VRT vs LII
Johnson Controls International plc
VRT vs JCI
Walt Disney Co
VRT vs DIS
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
VRT vs EMR
SPX Technologies, Inc.
VRT vs SPXC
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe VRT can sustain 27.7% revenue growth while expanding margins enough to justify 70.8x earnings, then hold or own the stock; otherwise, TT and DCF comparisons argue for reducing exposure because the current price sits far above both the implied price and TT range.
On a P/E basis, VRT trades at 70.8x versus TT at 35.5x, and the provided implied price of $120.96 suggests nearly 49.9% downside from the current $241.57 price. VRT also trades at a premium on sales and EBITDA multiples, which is only partially justified by faster growth.
Supporting Metrics
