Vontier Corporation
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- +$2.10B
- Cash
- −$492.20M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: VNT stock price vs FTV: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at FTV's multiple
Needs FTV P/E.
Implied fair value · at VNT's multiple
Needs VNT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Vontier Corporation · implied price per share
Bear
$17.40
Base
$20.92
Bull
$27.16
Fortive Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC
VNT vs ROP
DOVER Corp
VNT vs DOV
BADGER METER INC
VNT vs BMI
ITRON, INC.
VNT vs ITRI
AMETEK INC/
VNT vs AME
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
VNT vs EMR
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
VNT vs HON
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC
VNT vs ROK
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
VNT vs KEYS
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC
VNT vs TDY
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe VNT can sustain its positive revenue growth and high ROIC while maintaining leverage discipline, then VNT looks attractive relative to FTV because it trades at much lower P/E, P/S, and EV/EBITDA multiples despite comparable operating margins.
VNT trades at a steep discount to FTV across earnings, sales, and cash-flow proxy multiples, which explains the large model-implied upside. However, the valuation gap is partly offset by VNT's weaker gross margin and higher debt burden relative to FTV.
Supporting Metrics