Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: VIRT stock price vs ORCL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ORCL's multiple
Needs ORCL P/E.
Implied fair value · at VIRT's multiple
Needs VIRT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Virtu Financial, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
ORACLE CORP · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
VIRT vs IBKR
Tradeweb Markets Inc.
VIRT vs TW
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC
VIRT vs MKTX
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
VIRT vs CBOE
NASDAQ, INC.
VIRT vs NDAQ
Microsoft Corporation
VIRT vs MSFT
Amazon.com, Inc.
VIRT vs AMZN
Alphabet Inc.
VIRT vs GOOGL
International Business Machines Corporation
VIRT vs IBM
Cisco Systems, Inc.
VIRT vs CSCO
Salesforce, Inc.
VIRT vs CRM
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe VIRT can sustain its faster revenue growth while improving margins and maintaining manageable leverage, then the current discount could justify a buy, because VIRT trades far below ORCL on P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue despite being near its own historical range.
VIRT trades at a large discount to ORCL across P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, which is consistent with the much lower implied price relative to ORCL-based valuation. However, VIRT is already near the top of its historical trading band, so the apparent discount is less compelling in absolute terms.
Supporting Metrics
