Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: VIRT stock price vs CXW: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CXW's multiple
Needs CXW P/E.
Implied fair value · at VIRT's multiple
Needs VIRT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
11 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Virtu Financial, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
CORECIVIC, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
VIRT vs IBKR
Tradeweb Markets Inc.
VIRT vs TW
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC
VIRT vs MKTX
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
VIRT vs CBOE
NASDAQ, INC.
VIRT vs NDAQ
GEO GROUP INC
VIRT vs GEO
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS INC
VIRT vs NHI
AMERICAN TOWER CORP /MA/
VIRT vs AMT
EQUINIX INC
VIRT vs EQIX
Public Storage
VIRT vs PSA
Extra Space Storage Inc.
VIRT vs EXR
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe VIRT can sustain its faster growth and superior margin profile while the market re-rates it closer to the DCF and CXW-implied ranges, then VIRT looks attractive to own because it trades at a lower P/E and EV/EBITDA than CXW despite stronger profitability.
On a relative basis, VIRT trades at a clear discount to CXW on P/E and EV/EBITDA, while P/S is identical. The implied price of $147.39 sits well above the current price of $61.77 and also above the top end of the historical band, suggesting the market is pricing VIRT conservatively versus CXW-based and DCF frameworks.
Supporting Metrics
