Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: VEEV stock price vs LDOS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at LDOS's multiple
Needs LDOS P/E.
Implied fair value · at VEEV's multiple
Needs VEEV P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Veeva Systems Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Leidos Holdings, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Salesforce, Inc.
VEEV vs CRM
Adobe Inc.
VEEV vs ADBE
Microsoft Corporation
VEEV vs MSFT
Oracle Corporation
VEEV vs ORCL
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
VEEV vs IBM
Accenture plc
VEEV vs ACN
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
VEEV vs LMT
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP /DE/
VEEV vs NOC
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
VEEV vs GD
ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP
VEEV vs ZBRA
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe VEEV can sustain its 16.3% revenue growth and 75.5% gross margin without multiple compression, then hold or accumulate on significant pullbacks because the business quality is clearly superior even though the current price sits well above both LDOS-implied and DCF estimates.
VEEV trades at $203.78 versus a LDOS-implied price of $56.45, implying -72.3% downside on the stated P/E basis. The gap reflects VEEV’s much higher growth and margin profile, but the current multiple still looks rich relative to LDOS and even above VEEV’s DCF range.
Supporting Metrics
