Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot
VC stock price vs CB: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Latest stored price
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan where each company leads, where gaps are small, and where comparisons are not meaningful.
| Metric | VC | CB | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Revenue growth (YoY) FY 2024 -> FY 2025 | -2.5% | 6.5% | CB leads by 138.7% Higher Revenue growth |
Gross margin | 14.1% | N/M | Insufficient data Pricing power |
EBITDA margin | 12.2% | 24.3% | CB leads by 49.7% Higher EBITDA margin |
EV/Revenue | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
P/E | N/M | N/M | Not comparable Not comparable |
Net debt / EBITDA | -1.1 | 1.1 | VC leads by 206.5% Lower Net debt / EBITDA |
Statements
Core income statement and balance sheet metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | VC | Delta vs CB | CB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.77B | 93.7% lower | $59.40B |
| Gross profit | $532.00M | N/A | — |
| Operating income | — | N/A | — |
| EBITDA | $461.00M | 96.8% lower | $14.45B |
| Net income | $201.00M | 98.1% lower | $10.31B |
| EPS | 7.3 | 71.7% lower | 25.7 |
| Revenue growth | -2.5% | 138.7% lower | 6.5% |
| Gross margin | 14.1% | N/A | — |
| Operating margin | — | N/A | — |
| EBITDA margin | 12.2% | 49.7% lower | 24.3% |
| Net margin | 5.3% | 69.3% lower | 17.4% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
Market cap + debt - cash, shown for the current pair and benchmark median context.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both companies in context relative to a wider comparable universe.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
VC is trading essentially at fair value versus the P/E-based implied price, but its cheaper sales and EV multiples are offset by weaker growth and lower profitability than CB.
If you believe VC can reaccelerate revenue growth and expand margins toward CB levels, then a modestly constructive stance is justified because the stock already trades near fair value on P/E and at a large discount on EV-based multiples; otherwise, the current setup looks like a hold rather than an obvious bargain.
VC’s current price of $102.92 is basically in line with the P/E implied price of $102.39, implying only -0.5% downside. Relative to CB, VC screens much cheaper on revenue-based and enterprise value multiples, but that discount reflects a materially lower-quality earnings and growth profile.
Supporting Metrics