Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: URI stock price vs WWD: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WWD's multiple
Needs WWD P/E.
Implied fair value · at URI's multiple
Needs URI P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
United Rentals, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
WOODWARD, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$51.12
Base
$61.22
Bull
$74.37
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CATERPILLAR INC
URI vs CAT
DEERE & CO
URI vs DE
CUMMINS INC
URI vs CMI
TEXTRON INC
URI vs TXT
TEREX CORP
URI vs TEX
H&E Equipment Services, Inc.
URI vs HEES
HEXCEL CORP /DE/
URI vs HXL
Parker-Hannifin Corp
URI vs PH
Eaton Corp plc
URI vs ETN
RTX Corp
URI vs RTX
CURTISS WRIGHT CORP
URI vs CW
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe URI can sustain its stronger margins and manage leverage without a cyclical earnings downturn, then URI looks attractive versus WWD because it is cheaper on P/E, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue while posting better profitability.
URI trades at a clear discount to WWD on absolute and relative valuation metrics despite stronger operating performance. The stock’s current price of $1115.92 implies meaningful upside to WWD-based estimate of $1952.36, with the broader WWD-implied range also above the current level.
Supporting Metrics
