Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: UPS stock price vs WAB: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WAB's multiple
Needs WAB P/E.
Implied fair value · at UPS's multiple
Needs UPS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC · implied price per share
Bear
$52.23
Base
$61.40
Bull
$77.67
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
FedEx Corporation
UPS vs FDX
XPO, Inc.
UPS vs XPO
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
UPS vs JBHT
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
UPS vs ODFL
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON INC
UPS vs EXPD
Caterpillar Inc.
UPS vs CAT
CUMMINS INC
UPS vs CMI
GATX CORP
UPS vs GATX
Parker-Hannifin Corp
UPS vs PH
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe UPS’s margin pressure and negative revenue growth are temporary and that its ROIC and lower multiples will persist, then the stock looks attractive to accumulate relative to WAB because UPS already trades at a steep discount on P/E, P/S, and EV/EBITDA; if you expect growth to remain weak, the current discount is likely warranted.
UPS trades at 16.3x P/E versus WAB at 43.4x, which implies a large valuation discount on earnings despite UPS being the larger revenue and profit generator. The provided P/E-based implied price of $284.75 suggests 166.4% upside, but that estimate looks aggressive given UPS also trades below WAB on P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue.
Supporting Metrics
