United Parcel Service Inc
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- +$24.13B
- Cash
- −$5.89B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: UPS stock price vs UHAL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at UHAL's multiple
Needs UHAL P/E.
Implied fair value · at UPS's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, UPS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC · implied price per share
Bear
$52.23
Base
$61.40
Bull
$77.67
U-Haul Holding Company · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
FedEx Corporation
UPS vs FDX
XPO, Inc.
UPS vs XPO
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
UPS vs JBHT
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
UPS vs ODFL
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON INC
UPS vs EXPD
RUSH ENTERPRISES INC \TX\
UPS vs RUSHA
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.
UPS vs CAR
HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC
UPS vs HTZ
RYDER SYSTEM INC
UPS vs R
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe UPS deserves a premium for stronger ROIC and profitability, then hold or selectively add only on pullbacks because the current price is already near the top of its historical band and far above UHAL-implied range.
The stated P/E-based implied price of $1,104.80 is far above UPS’s current price of $106.15, creating a 940.8% upside figure that is not consistent with the rest of the valuation set. On UHAL-comparison basis, UPS also looks expensive relative to UHAL-implied range of $28.80 to $40.07, while its own historical band of $95.54 to $116.77 suggests it is trading near the upper end of its normal range.
Supporting Metrics