Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: UPS stock price vs PEP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PEP's multiple
Needs PEP P/E.
Implied fair value · at UPS's multiple
Needs UPS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC · implied price per share
Bear
$52.23
Base
$61.40
Bull
$77.67
PepsiCo, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$33.73
Base
$44.81
Bull
$59.24
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
FedEx Corporation
UPS vs FDX
XPO, Inc.
UPS vs XPO
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
UPS vs JBHT
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
UPS vs ODFL
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON INC
UPS vs EXPD
COCA COLA CO
UPS vs KO
STARBUCKS CORP
UPS vs SBUX
Mondelez International, Inc.
UPS vs MDLZ
Kraft Heinz Co
UPS vs KHC
TYSON FOODS, INC.
UPS vs TSN
KELLANOVA
UPS vs K
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe UPS can stabilize revenue growth and sustain its 23.0% ROIC while margins improve, then UPS looks attractive relative to PEP because it trades at materially lower P/E, P/S, and EV/EBITDA multiples.
UPS trades at a meaningfully lower multiple than PEP across earnings and sales metrics, which explains the modeled upside to PEP-implied price of $152.59. The discount is consistent with UPS’s weaker top-line growth and thinner margins, but the current price also sits near the lower end of its historical range.
Supporting Metrics
