Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot
UL stock price vs PFE: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan where each company leads, where gaps are small, and where comparisons are not meaningful.
| Metric | UL | PFE | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Revenue growth (YoY) FY 2024 -> FY 2025 | -16.9% | -1.6% | PFE leads by 925.0% Higher Revenue growth |
Gross margin | 46.9% | 74.3% | PFE leads by 36.8% Higher Gross margin |
EBITDA margin | 22.2% | 29.1% | PFE leads by 23.8% Higher EBITDA margin |
EV/Revenue | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
P/E | N/M | N/M | Not comparable Not comparable |
Net debt / EBITDA | 4.0 | 3.0 | PFE leads by 33.7% Lower Net debt / EBITDA |
Statements
Core income statement and balance sheet metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | UL | Delta vs PFE | PFE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.50B | 19.3% lower | $62.58B |
| Gross profit | $23.71B | 49.0% lower | $46.51B |
| Operating income | — | N/A | — |
| EBITDA | $11.20B | 38.5% lower | $18.22B |
| Net income | $10.01B | 28.8% higher | $7.77B |
| EPS | 4.3 | 218.4% higher | 1.4 |
| Revenue growth | -16.9% | 925.0% lower | -1.6% |
| Gross margin | 46.9% | 36.8% lower | 74.3% |
| Operating margin | — | N/A | — |
| EBITDA margin | 22.2% | 23.8% lower | 29.1% |
| Net margin | 19.8% | 59.6% higher | 12.4% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
Market cap + debt - cash, shown for the current pair and benchmark median context.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both companies in context relative to a wider comparable universe.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
UL screens cheaper on P/E than PFE and sits below the top of its historical range, but weaker growth and lower quality scores temper the apparent valuation discount.
If you believe UL can stabilize revenue growth and sustain its current margin profile, then a modest long position can be justified because the stock trades at a lower P/E than PFE and is below the P/E-implied price.
UL trades at 12.8x P/E versus PFE at 18.4x, which suggests a relative valuation discount on earnings. However, UL is not cheap on all bases because its P/S multiple is slightly above PFE's and its EV/EBITDA is higher, while the implied upside from the P/E model must be weighed against a much lower DCF range.
Supporting Metrics