Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: UHAL stock price vs UBER: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at UBER's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, UBER P/E.
Implied fair value · at UHAL's multiple
Needs UHAL P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
U-Haul Holding Company · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
RUSH ENTERPRISES INC \TX\
UHAL vs RUSHA
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.
UHAL vs CAR
HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC
UHAL vs HTZ
RYDER SYSTEM INC
UHAL vs R
Lyft, Inc.
UHAL vs LYFT
AMAZON COM INC
UHAL vs AMZN
C. H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
UHAL vs CHRW
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
UHAL vs UPS
FEDEX CORP
UHAL vs FDX
DoorDash, Inc.
UHAL vs DASH
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe UHAL can materially accelerate growth and sustain higher-quality earnings conversion while deleveraging, then hold or accumulate on weakness because the sales and EBITDA multiples are well below UBER's; otherwise, the weak 3.6% growth, 1.4% net margin, and 4.1x net debt/EBITDA argue for caution.
On a P/E basis, UHAL trades at 147.1x versus UBER at 14.6x, which makes UHAL look far more expensive on current earnings despite its lower absolute price. On sales and EBITDA-based measures, UHAL is cheaper than UBER, but the overall valuation picture is mixed because the P/E gap is very large and the implied price from the model is far below the current price.
Supporting Metrics
