Uber Technologies, Inc.
—- Market cap
- $148.21B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$7.11B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: UBER stock price vs WERN: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WERN's multiple
Needs WERN P/E.
Implied fair value · at UBER's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative.
Snapshot Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Lyft, Inc.
UBER vs LYFT
AMAZON COM INC
UBER vs AMZN
C. H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
UBER vs CHRW
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
UBER vs UPS
FEDEX CORP
UBER vs FDX
DoorDash, Inc.
UBER vs DASH
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
UBER vs ODFL
LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC
UBER vs LSTR
SAIA INC
UBER vs SAIA
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
UBER vs KNX
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe UBER can sustain its 18.3% revenue growth and 17.9% ROIC, then hold rather than aggressively add on this screen because the relative P/S model still shows a large premium versus WERN and places UBER well above WERN-implied and DCF ranges.
The valuation gap is extreme: UBER’s current price of $75.02 compares with an implied price of $19.12 from the P/S framework, implying 74.5% downside. The gap is driven by WERN’s much lower P/S multiple of 0.8x versus UBER’s 2.9x, though the comparison is partially distorted by the very different business quality and growth profiles.
Supporting Metrics