Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: UBER stock price vs CAR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CAR's multiple
Needs CAR P/E.
Implied fair value · at UBER's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, UBER P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Lyft, Inc.
UBER vs LYFT
AMAZON COM INC
UBER vs AMZN
C. H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
UBER vs CHRW
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
UBER vs UPS
FEDEX CORP
UBER vs FDX
DoorDash, Inc.
UBER vs DASH
FORD MOTOR CO
UBER vs F
General Motors Co
UBER vs GM
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
UBER vs JBHT
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORP
UBER vs WAB
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
UBER vs ODFL
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe UBER can sustain high-teens revenue growth and maintain strong profitability, then hold or accumulate on weakness rather than anchoring to the CAR-implied price, because UBER’s 18.3% growth, 19.3% net margin, and 17.9% ROIC are fundamentally superior to CAR’s negative earnings and higher leverage.
UBER’s current price of $71.60 sits well above CAR-implied price range of $10.62 to $16.35, while the P/S-based implied price is just $10.51, implying -85.3% downside. That gap is driven by the fact that CAR trades at a very low 0.4x P/S and 0.9x EV/Revenue despite negative earnings, while UBER commands 2.8x P/S because it is profitable and growing.
Supporting Metrics
