Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TXN stock price vs SATS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at SATS's multiple
Needs SATS P/E.
Implied fair value · at TXN's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, TXN P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED · implied price per share
Bear
$20.64
Base
$24.46
Bull
$31.23
EchoStar Corporation · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Intel Corporation
TXN vs INTC
QUALCOMM Incorporated
TXN vs QCOM
NVIDIA Corporation
TXN vs NVDA
Broadcom Inc.
TXN vs AVGO
AT&T INC.
TXN vs T
Clearfield, Inc.
TXN vs CLFD
T-Mobile US, Inc.
TXN vs TMUS
COMCAST CORP
TXN vs CMCSA
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
TXN vs VZ
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/
TXN vs CHTR
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TXN can keep compounding at its current quality levels, then avoid using SATS as a valuation anchor because SATS is fundamentally distressed and produces an unrealistic implied price; the data instead argues for caution on TXN's premium valuation versus its own DCF and historical range.
The valuation gap is massive: TXN trades at $275.74 versus an implied price of $5.21 on the P/S comparison, which implies -98.1% downside. That gap is driven by TXN's much richer trading multiples versus SATS's low sales multiple, but SATS's distressed fundamentals make the cross-comparison weak as a standalone valuation signal.
Supporting Metrics
