Texas Instruments Incorporated
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- +$14.05B
- Cash
- −$3.23B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TXN stock price vs NTAP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NTAP's multiple
Needs NTAP P/E.
Implied fair value · at TXN's multiple
Needs TXN P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED · implied price per share
Bear
$20.64
Base
$24.46
Bull
$31.23
NetApp, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$88.82
Base
$102.84
Bull
$121.94
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Intel Corporation
TXN vs INTC
QUALCOMM Incorporated
TXN vs QCOM
NVIDIA Corporation
TXN vs NVDA
Broadcom Inc.
TXN vs AVGO
Pure Storage, Inc.
TXN vs PSTG
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
TXN vs IBM
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
TXN vs MU
Dell Technologies Inc.
TXN vs DELL
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
TXN vs STX
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co
TXN vs HPE
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TXN can sustain its 13.0% revenue growth and 34.1% operating margin for an extended period, then hold only if you are comfortable paying a premium multiple; otherwise, the data favors reducing exposure because the implied price is 44.4% below the current price.
TXN trades at a significant premium to NTAP across P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, while the model implies 44.4% downside to $153.20. The gap is driven by TXN's higher profitability and growth, but the valuation still sits well above both NTAP and TXN's own historical band.
Supporting Metrics